In the second round, experienced participants were asked to reappraise the relevance of each procedure informed by round 1 results. In the first round, they were asked to comment on definitions, rate the importance of preidentified methodological procedures using a 9-item Likert scale, and suggest additional procedures. Methods: A Delphi study with 2 rounds was conducted with a panel of international participants experienced in usability evaluation. Objective: The aim of the study is to generate consensus on terms and procedures that should be considered when planning and reporting a study on a usability evaluation of health-related digital solutions both by users and experts and provide a checklist that can easily be used by researchers when conducting their usability studies. However, despite the widespread recognition of the importance of usability evaluation, there is a lack of research and consensus on related concepts and reporting standards. Usability evaluation improves the probability of having digital solutions that are easier, safer, more efficient, and more pleasant to use. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal 10 articlesĬenter for Health Technology and Services ResearchĮmail: Usability evaluation both by experts and target users is an integral part of the process of developing and assessing digital solutions.JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology 32 articles.JMIR Biomedical Engineering 68 articles.Journal of Participatory Medicine 78 articles.JMIR Perioperative Medicine 89 articles.
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 279 articles.Interactive Journal of Medical Research 306 articles.JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 1141 articles.Journal of Medical Internet Research 7471 articles.
0 kommentar(er)
